Maybe George Is Alive Within The HCPS

Doublethink - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

"According to the novel, doublethink is:
“The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them....To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies — all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.[1]"

"Tampering with reality" is an interesting concept.

One sheriff report, that is so far known to be real:

"The report was closed with some indicators of abuse."

Then

Two Professional Standards Office Reports - the original and the corrected copy.



The first PSO report states quite clearly:

"On 6/22/09, writer spoke with CPI Auza. He advised that he closed his case with Some Indicators for threatened harm.

Are we to assume that "some indicators of abuse" (HCSO) is the same as "some indicators for threatened harm?(PSO)" At least, the phrase "some indicators" is the same on the HCSO and the PSO reports.

The second PSO reports states quite clearly:

"On 6/22/09 writer spoke with CPI Auza. He advised that he closed his case with No Indicators for threatened harm; however Some Indicators for unusual behavior.

Are we to assume that the HCSO phrase "some indicators of abuse" now means "no indicators for threatened harm" and also means "Some indicators for unusual behavior?"

One HCSO report.

Two PSO reports.

Two PSO reports that interpret one HCSO. The interpretations happened on the same day of June 22, 2009.

No further information.

Doublethink?

Clearly there are some indicators for unusual behavior when one studies how two different outcomes can be generated from one single source.

Don't ya' think?